OVERVIEW OF TELEDIAGNOSIS IN BRAZIL FROM 2016 TO THE FIRST WAVE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Authors

  • Felipe José Jandre Reis Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brasil.
  • Clarissa de Castro Brasil Pinheiro Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brasil.
  • Pâmela Martin Bandeira Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brasil.
  • Lívia Gaspar Fernandes Universidade da Cidade de São Paulo. São Paulo, SP - Brasil.
  • Bruno Tirotti Saragiotto Universidade da Cidade de São Paulo. São Paulo, SP - Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54620/cadesp.v17i1.1396

Keywords:

eHealth Strategies, Telemedicine, COVID-19

Abstract

Telemedicine, including telediagnosis, must be recognized as an alternative to overcome geographical barriers, provide patients with access to health care and ensure continuity of follow-up. The aim of this study was to quantify the number of telediagnosis from 2016 to the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. This study is a secondary analysis of data from the Brazilian Ministry of Health. The main outcomes were: total number of telediagnoses performed, mean time to telediagnosis notification; the distribution of states and municipalities with the highest number of telediagnosis and the health specialties that performed telediagnosis the most. A total of 4,010,087 telediagnoses with irregular distribution were identified (59.5% in Minas Gerais, 29.4% in Santa Catarina, 3.3% in Ceará and 2.2% in Bahia). At the beginning of COVID cases in Brazil, there was a reduction in telediagnosis, being 12% in February, 41% in March, 81% in April, 80% in May and 76% in June. Brazil presented an irregular distribution of telediagnoses in the different states. During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, a significant reduction in the number of telediagnoses was observed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

World Health Organization. Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in member states. Report on the second global survey on eHealth. World Health Organization; 2010.

Wen CL. Telemedicina e Telessaúde – Um panorama no Brasil. Informatica Pública. 2008;10(2):07–15.

Santos WS, de Sousa Júnior JH, Soares JC, Raasch M. Reflexões acerca do uso da telemedicina no Brasil: oportunidade ou ameaça? Revista de Gestão em Sistemas de Saúde. 2020;9(3):433–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5585/rgss.v9i3.17514

Anderson RM, Heesterbeek H, Klinkenberg D, Hollingsworth TD. How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? The lancet. 2020;395(10228):931–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30567-5

Fioratti I, Reis FJJ, Fernandes LG, Saragiotto BT, Fioratti I, Reis FJJ, et al. The COVID-19 pandemic and the regulations of remote attendance in Brazil: new opportunities for people dealing with chronic pain. Brazilian Journal Of Pain. 2020;3(2):193–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/2595-0118.20200039

Augusto Filho RF, Campelo CM. FERRAMENTAS DE TELESSAÚDE NO COMBATE À COVID-19 NO CEARÁ. Cadernos ESP. 2022;16(2):107–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54620/cadesp.v16i2.714

Sousa AR, Rodrigues IP, Silva PRC, de Silva Rodrigues T, Melo TAS. ISOLADOS E ASSISTIDOS: TELESSAÚDE POR UMA EQUIPE MULTIPROFISSIONAL: ISOLATED AND ASSISTED: TELEHEALTH BY A MULTIPROFESSIONAL TEAM. Cadernos ESP. 2020;14(1):109–13.

Fioratti I, Reis FJJ, Fernandes LG, Saragiotto BT. A pandemia de COVID-19 e a regulamentação do atendimento remoto no Brasil: novas oportunidades às pessoas com dor crônica. BrJP. 2020;3(2):193–4.

Caetano R, Silva AB, Guedes ACCM, de Paiva CCN, da Rocha Ribeiro G, Santos DL, et al. Challenges and opportunities for telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: Ideas on spaces and initiatives in the Brazilian context. Cadernos de Saude Publica. 2020;36(5):1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00088920

Fioratti I, Fernandes LG, Reis FJ, Saragiotto BT. Strategies for a safe and assertive telerehabilitation practice. Brazilian journal of physical therapy. 2021;25(2):113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.07.009

Fernandes LG, Saragiotto BT. To what extent can telerehabilitation help patients in low-and middle-income countries? 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.11.004

Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K, Brooks M. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review. Journal of telemedicine and telecare. 2018;24(1):4–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X16674087

Fernandes LG, Devan H, Fioratti I, Kamper SJ, Williams CM, Saragiotto BT. At my own space, pace and place: a systematic review of qualitative studies of enablers and barriers to telehealth interventions for people with chronic pain. PAIN. 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002364

Jaffe DH, Lee L, Huynh S, Haskell TP. Health Inequalities in the Use of Telehealth in the United States in the Lens of COVID-19. Population health management. 2020;23(5):368–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2020.0186

Fisk M, Livingstone A, Pit SW. Telehealth in the context of COVID-19: Changing perspectives in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020;22(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/19264

Giovanella L, Escorel S, Mendonça MHM de. Porta de entrada pela atenção básica? Integração do PSF à rede de serviços de saúde. Saúde debate. 2003;27(65):278–89.

Published

2023-08-10

How to Cite

1.
Jandre Reis FJ, de Castro Brasil Pinheiro C, Martin Bandeira P, Gaspar Fernandes L, Tirotti Saragiotto B. OVERVIEW OF TELEDIAGNOSIS IN BRAZIL FROM 2016 TO THE FIRST WAVE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC. Cadernos ESP [Internet]. 2023 Aug. 10 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];17(1):e1396. Available from: https://cadernos.esp.ce.gov.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/1396
Received 2022-10-22
Accepted 2023-04-04
Published 2023-08-10