EVALUATION OF REACTIONS IN THE SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION WORKSHOP

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54620/cadesp.v17i1.1793

Keywords:

Information dissemination, Health Evaluation, Diffusion of innovations

Abstract

Describe the experience in the process of evaluating the effectiveness of the scientific knowledge production workshop in training the teams awarded in the 2nd Innovative Municipal Competition. Experience report on evaluating the reaction in knowledge production workshops carried out by the research team at the School of Public Health of Ceará from May to August 2023, together with the teams awarded in the 2nd edition of the Innovative Municipal Competition at Oficinas. There were 16 meetings and only 5 teams from the ten practices maintained regular participation in the workshops. Each team developed an article and responded to the evaluation form. Positive relationships were observed between reactions and impact of the workshops, with a rapprochement of ideas, terms, concepts related to the theme and scientific research. The experience was challenging, however, it contributed positively to the planning of actions, so that they can expand their potential for production and dissemination of practices through articles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Secretaria de Saúde do Estado do Ceará (Sesa). Cuidar Melhor: o programa. Governo do Estado do Ceará. 2021. Disponível em: https://www.saude.ce.gov.br/cuidarmelhor/servico/programa/. Acesso em: 05 set.2023.

Silva LKC, Moreira FJF, Abreu LDP, Castro Júnior AR, Silva KA, Nério VRP. Gestão de resultados do 1º Concurso Município Inovador. Cadernos ESP [Internet]. 2022 [citado 2023 10- 05];16(3):136-141. Disponível em: https://cadernos.esp.ce.gov.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/1138/359. Acesso em: 09 out.2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54620/cadesp.v16i3.1138

Moreira, FJF; Cavalcanti. CGCS; Barbosa, RB; de Abreu, LDP; Pereira, AGC. Manual de práticas: concurso município inovador do Programa Cuidar melhor Ceará. Fortaleza: Escola de Saúde Pública do Ceará. 2022[citado 2023 10- 01]. Disponível em: https://www.saude.ce.gov.br/2022/11/23/programa-cuidar-melhor-lanca-segunda-edicao-do-concurso-municipio-inovador/. Acesso em: 11 out.2023.

Spink, MJ; Menegon, V. M; Medrado, B. Oficinas como estratégia de pesquisa: articulações Teórico-Metodológicas e Aplicações Ético-Políticas. Psicologia & Sociedade, 26(1), 32-43, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-71822014000100005

Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. Como avaliar programas de treinamento de equipes: os quatro níveis. Rio de Janeiro: Senac; 2010. 388p

Costa NM da, Silva EV da, Barros LM, Kobayashi RM. Construção e validação das competências profissionais do enfermeiro atuante em hemodinâmica. Rev Min Enferm. 2023;27:e-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35699/2316-9389.2023.40259

Norcini J; Anderson MB; Bollela V; Burch V; Costa MJ; Duvivier R; et al. Consensus framework for good assessment. Med Teach. 2018 Nov; 40(11):1102-9. DOI: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1500016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1500016

Brasil IV, Blass L, Maria da Silva JS. Introduzindo o conceito de avaliação por rubricas por intermédio de oficinas: análise de uma experiência piloto. Contexto e Educação. 2023;36(113):54-73. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21527/2179-1309.2021.113.54-73 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21527/2179-1309.2021.113.54-73

Li H; Gobert J; Dicker R; Morand N. Students’ academic language use when constructing scientific explanations in an intelligent tutoring system. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_20

Bastiani E, Mazzuco AER, Reategui EB. Intelligent Tutoring Systems applied to academic writing: a systematic review. Informática na Educação: teoria & prática Porto Alegre, 2018;23(30): 85-99.

Price Waterhouse Coopers. PwC Brasil. O abismo digital no Brasil: saiba como desigualdade de acesso à internet, a infraestrutura inadequada e a educação deficitária limitam as nossas opções para o futuro. PwC Brasil, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.pwc.com.br/pt/estudos/preocupacoes-ceos/mais-temas/2022/o-abismo-digital-no-brasil.html Acesso em: 08 out. 2023.

Xiao C; Li Y. Analysis on the Influence of Epidemic on Education in China. In: Das, Veena; Khan, Naveeda (ed.). Covid-19 and Student Focused Concerns: Threatsand Possibilities, American Ethnologist website. 2020. Disponível em: https://americanethnologist.org/features/collections/covid-19-and-studentfocused-concerns-threats-and-possibilities/analysis-on-the-influence-ofepidemic-on-education-in-china. Acesso em: 10 out.2023.

Barrichello, A; Kanaane, R; Pamboukian, S e Queiroz; LR. Avaliação Educacional nas Graduações Tecnológicas: Desafios Durante a Pandemia. Est. Aval. Educ. [online]. 2021, vol.32 [citado 2023-10-16], e08254. Disponível em: http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-68312021000100106&lng=pt&nrm=iso. Acesso em: 10 out.2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18222/eae.v32.8254

Garcia J; Garcia NF. Impactos da pandemia de COVID-19 nas práticas de avaliação da aprendizagem na graduação. EccoS. 2020;(55):e18870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5585/eccos.n55.18870 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5585/eccos.n55.18870

Published

2023-12-26

How to Cite

1.
Martins MIS, Santos ML dos, Abreu LDP de, Castro Júnior AR de, Carvalho JA de, Gomes TF. EVALUATION OF REACTIONS IN THE SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION WORKSHOP. Cadernos ESP [Internet]. 2023 Dec. 26 [cited 2024 Jul. 3];17(1):e1793. Available from: https://cadernos.esp.ce.gov.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/1793

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Experience Report, Update And/Or Technological Innovation

Categories

Received 2023-10-26
Accepted 2023-11-07
Published 2023-12-26

Most read articles by the same author(s)