HIGH FLOW THERAPY VERSUS NON-INVASIVE MECHANICAL VENTILATION IN POST-OPERATORY OF PEDIATRIC HEART SURGERY

INTEGRATIVE REVIEW

Authors

  • Mariana De Sousa Lima Escola de Saúde Pública
  • Geisyani Francisca Gomes Prudente
  • Natália Lima Barbosa
  • Danielle Carvalho Fonseca Falanga

Keywords:

Physiotherapy, Intensive Care Units, Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures, Non-Invasive ventilation, oxygen therapy

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the main differences between high flow therapy and non-invasive ventilation in the postoperative period of pediatric cardiac surgery. The research was carried out in the electronic databases VIRTUAL HEALTH LIBRARY (VHL) - SciELO, LILACS and MEDLINE, using the following keywords: Cardiac Surgery, Non-Invasive Ventilation and Oxygen Therapy, published in the year 2010 to 2020. A total of 54 possibly relevant studies were found, 24 selected for detailed analysis and only 7 were included in the review. The articles were organized as follows: Author / year, type of study, sample, objective and result for a better understanding. The present study shows that noninvasive ventilation is used mainly at two pressure levels, improves ventilation capacity, decreasing carbon dioxide levels, while high-flow therapy increases oxygen levels. High flow therapy, compared to non-invasive ventilation, does not allow to regulate and measure the amount of positive pressure generated in the airways.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Published

2021-05-21

How to Cite

1.
HIGH FLOW THERAPY VERSUS NON-INVASIVE MECHANICAL VENTILATION IN POST-OPERATORY OF PEDIATRIC HEART SURGERY: INTEGRATIVE REVIEW. Cadernos ESP [Internet]. 2021 May 21 [cited 2026 Mar. 5];15(1):99-109. Available from: https://cadernos.esp.ce.gov.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/504

Similar Articles

1-10 of 562

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.